International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences
Abbreviation: IJIASOS | ISSN (Print): 2602-4802 | ISSN (Online): 2602-4500 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiasos

Original article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences 2022, Vol. 6(2) 109-137

Sendikalaşma ve Sosyal Harcama İlişkisi: Bir Politika Geri Besleme Etkisinden Söz Etmek Mümkün müdür?

Ufuk Özer & Mehmet Hanefi̇ Topal

pp. 109 - 137   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasos.2022.458.4

Published online: June 30, 2022  |   Number of Views: 99  |  Number of Download: 321

Download PDF

Abstract

Kamu politikaları, yalnızca kolektif politika aktörlerinin eylemlerine karşı bir reaksiyon değildir. Aynı zamanda kolektif politika aktörlerinin örgütlenme gücü üzerinde de etkili olabilir. İkinci duruma literatürde politika geri besleme etkisi denir. Bununla beraber, sendikalaşma ile sosyal harcama ilişkisini politika geri besleme etkisi bağlamında araştıran çok az sayıda ampirik araştırma mevcuttur. Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, 1990 sonrası dönemde sendikalaşma ile sosyal harcamalar arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektir. 24 OECD ülkesinin 1990-2015 dönemi verilerinin kullanıldığı ve panel regresyon ile nedensellik analizlerinin uygulandığı araştırmada, sendikal yoğunluk ve sosyal harcamalar arasındaki ilişkiler analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre, OECD ülkelerinde 1990 sonrası dönemde sendikal yoğunluk sosyal harcamaları, sosyal harcamalar da sendikal yoğunluğu anlamlı bir şekilde arttırmaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, politika geri besleme etkisine dair güçlü bir kanıt sunmaktadır.

Keywords: Sosyal harcamalar, Sendikalaşma, Politika geri besleme, Panel veri analizi

How to Cite this Article

APA 6th edition
Ozer, U. & Topal, M.H. (2022). Sendikalaşma ve Sosyal Harcama İlişkisi: Bir Politika Geri Besleme Etkisinden Söz Etmek Mümkün müdür? . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences, 6(2), 109-137. doi: 10.29329/ijiasos.2022.458.4

Harvard
Ozer, U. and Topal, M. (2022). Sendikalaşma ve Sosyal Harcama İlişkisi: Bir Politika Geri Besleme Etkisinden Söz Etmek Mümkün müdür? . International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences, 6(2), pp. 109-137.

Chicago 16th edition
Ozer, Ufuk and Mehmet Hanefi̇ Topal (2022). "Sendikalaşma ve Sosyal Harcama İlişkisi: Bir Politika Geri Besleme Etkisinden Söz Etmek Mümkün müdür? ". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences 6 (2):109-137. doi:10.29329/ijiasos.2022.458.4.
References
  1. Baum, C. F. (2001). Residual diagnostics for cross-section time series regression models. The Stata Journal, 1(1), 101-104. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bean, R., & Holden, K. (1994). Determinants of trade union membership in OECD countries: a survey. International Journal of Manpower, 15(6), 4-35. [Google Scholar]
  3. Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 634-647 [Google Scholar]
  4. Béland, D. (2001). Does labor matter? Institutions, labor unions and pension reform in France and the United States. Journal of Public Policy, 21(2), 153-172. [Google Scholar]
  5. Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019). Varieties of policy feedback research: Looking backward, moving forward. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 184-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12340 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  6. Bhargava, A., Franzini, L., & Narendranathan, W. (1982). Serial correlation and the fixed effects model. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(4), 533-549. [Google Scholar]
  7. Boreham, P., Hall, R., & Leet, M. (1996). Labour and citizenship: the development of welfare state regimes. Journal of Public Policy, 16(2), 203-227. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bradley, D., Huber, E., Moller, S., Nielsen, F., & Stephens, J. D. (2003). Distribution and redistribution in postindustrial democracies. World Politics, 55(2), 193-228. [Google Scholar]
  9. Cameron, David R. (1978). The Expansion of the Public Economy: A Comparative Analysis. The American Political Science Review, 72(4), 1243-1261. [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell A. L. (2018). Policy Feedback. obo in Political Science. doi: 10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0235 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  11. Campbell, A. L. (2003). How Policies Make Citizens: Senior Political Activism and the American Welfare State, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Campbell, A. L. (2012). Policy makes mass politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, 333-351. [Google Scholar]
  13. Canikalp, E., & Unlukaplan, I. (2017). Political determinants of social expenditures in Greece: an empirical analysis. Public Sector Economics, 41(3), 359-377. [Google Scholar]
  14. Checchi, D., & Visser, J. (2005). Pattern persistence in European trade union density: A longitudinal analysis 1950–1996. European Sociological Review, 21(1), 1-21. [Google Scholar]
  15. Çelik, A. ve Lordoğlu, K. (2006). Türkiye’de resmi sendikalaşma istatistiklerinin sorunlari üstüne. Çalışma ve Toplum, 2, 11-30. [Google Scholar]
  16. Dilaveroğlu, A. (2017). Kamu Politika Sürecinin Politik Çevre Bağlamında Değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 6(2), 37-51. [Google Scholar]
  17. Donado, A. & Walde, K. (2012). How trade unions ıncrease welfare. Economic Journal, 122(563), 990–1009. [Google Scholar]
  18. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. [Google Scholar]
  19. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2020). The lessons of policy learning: Types, triggers, hindrances and pathologies. In A Modern Guide to Public Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ebbinghaus, B., Gobel, C. & Koos, S. (2011). Social Capital, “Ghent” and Workplace Contexts Matter: Comparing Union Membership in Europe, European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(2), pp. 107–24. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eicke, L., & Weko, S. (2022). Does green growth foster green policies? Value chain upgrading and feedback mechanisms on renewable energy policies. Energy Policy, 165, 112948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112948 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  23. Golden, M. (1993). The Dynamics of Trade Unionism and National Economic Performance, American Political Science Review, Vol. 87(2), pp. 437–54. [Google Scholar]
  24. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th edition). Harlow: Pearson. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall, P. A. & Soskice, D. (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism, in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, (Ed.) Hall P. A. & Soskice, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-68. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1251-1271. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hirsch, B. T. (1980). The Determinants of Unionization: An Analysis of Interarea Differences. ILR Review, 33(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/001979398003300201 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  28. Hirsch, B. T., & Berger, M. C. (1984). Union Membership Determination and Industry Characteristics. Southern Economic Journal, 50(3), 665–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/1057983 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  29. Hodder, A., & Edwards, P. (2015). The essence of trade unions: understanding identity, ideology and purpose. Work, Employment and Society, 29(5), 843–854. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014568142 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  30. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross-sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hooghe M. & Oser J. (2016). Trade Union Density and Social Expenditure: A Longitudinal Analysis of Policy Feedback Effects in OECD Countries, 1980–2010, Journal of European Public Policy 23(10), pp. 1520-1542 [Google Scholar]
  32. Howell, D. R., Baker, D., Glyn, A. & Schmitt, J. (2007). Are Protective Labor Market Institutions at the Root of Unemployment? A Critical Review of the Evidence. Capitalism and Society 2(1), 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European trade unionism. London: SAGE. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jacobs, A. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2015). When policies undo themselves: Self‐undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance, 28(4), 441-457. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jaumotte, M. F., & Osorio, M. C. (2015). Inequality and Labor Market Institutions, International Monetary Fund. Discussion Note No 15(14), pp. 1-31. [Google Scholar]
  36. Jordan, J. (2013). Policy feedback and support for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(2), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928712471224 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  37. Kaymaz, V. (2018). OECD ülkelerinde sosyal harcamaların belirleyicileri. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 4(2), 118-130. [Google Scholar]
  38. Larsen, E.G. (2019), Policy Feedback Effects on Mass Publics: A Quantitative Review. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2): 372-394. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12280 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  39. Lewkowicz, J., & Lewczuk, A. (2017). An institutional approach to trade union density. the case of legal origins and political ideology. Central European Economic Journal, 2(49), 35-49. [Google Scholar]
  40. Lopez, S. H. (2004). Reorganizing the rust belt: An inside study of the American labor movement. University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahiroğulları, A. (2001). Türkiye’de sendikalaşma evreleri ve sendikalaşmayı etkileyen unsurlar. CÜ İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 2(1), 161-189. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mettler, S., & SoRelle, M. (2018). Policy feedback theory. In P.A Sabatier & C.M Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 103-134). Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mina, W. (2021). Do labor market flexibility and efficiency increase government social protection expenditures?. Applied Economics, 53(33), 3871-3887. [Google Scholar]
  44. Moore, W.J. (1998). The determinants and effects of right-to-work laws: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Labor Research 19(3), 445–469.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-998-1041-z  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  45. Ng, I. (1987). The economic and political determinants of trade union growth in selected OECD countries. Journal of Industrial Relations, 29(2), 233-242 [Google Scholar]
  46. OECD. (2020). Social expenditure (SOCX) update 2020: Social spending makes up 20% of OECD GDP, OECD, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/social/expenditure.htm. [Google Scholar]
  47. OECD. (2022). Trade unions: Trade union density. OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00371-en   (accessed on 26 June 2022). [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  48. Orloff, A. S., & Skocpol, T. (1984). Why Not Equal Protection? Explaining the Politics of Public Social Spending in Britain, 1900-1911, and the United States, 1880s-1920. American Sociological Review, 49(6), 726–750. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095527 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  49. Patashnik, E. M., & Zelizer, J. E. (2013). The struggle to remake politics: Liberal reform and the limits of policy feedback in the contemporary American state. Perspectives on Politics, 11(4), 1071-1087. [Google Scholar]
  50. Pesaran , M. H. (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels , IZA discussion paper No. 1240. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265-312. [Google Scholar]
  52. Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World politics, 45(4), 595-628. [Google Scholar]
  53. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and The Study of Politics, American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–67. [Google Scholar]
  54. Pontusson, J. (2013). Unionization, inequality and redistribution. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 51(4), 797-825. [Google Scholar]
  55. Potrafke, N. (2009). Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice, 140(1), 105-124. [Google Scholar]
  56. Riley, N. M. (1997). Determinants of union membership: A review. Labour, 11(2), 265-301. [Google Scholar]
  57. Schnabel C. (2020) Union Membership and Collective Bargaining: Trends and Determinants. In: Zimmermann K.F. (eds) Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_202-1  [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  58. Schnabel, C. and Wagner, J. (2007), Union density and determinants of union membership in 18 EU countries: evidence from micro data, 2002/03. Industrial Relations Journal 38:5-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2007.00433.x [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  59. Soares, M. M., & Machado, J. A. (2020). Effects of federalism on social policies in a comparative perspective: Argentina and Brazil. Brazilian Political Science Review, 14(3), 1-37. [Google Scholar]
  60. Thelen, K. (2001). Varieties of Labor Politics in the Developed Democracies. in Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, (Ed.) Hall P. A. & Soskice, D., Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 71-103. [Google Scholar]
  61. Visser J.; Hayter, S.; Gammarano, R. (2015). Trends in collective bargaining coverage: Stability, erosion or decline? Geneva: ILO, Labour Relations and Collective Bargaining Policy Brief No. 1. [Google Scholar]
  62. Weir, M., Orloff, A.S. & Skocpol, T. (1988). Introduction: Understanding American Social Politics. In The Politics of Social Policy in the United States, ed. Margaret Weir, Ann Shola Orloff, and Theda Skocpol. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1-36. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press. [Google Scholar]
  64. Zarate Tenorio, B. (2014). Social spending responses to organized labor and mass protests in Latin America, 1970-2007. Comparative Political Studies, 47(14), 1945-1972. [Google Scholar]
Meta
Vol. 6 (2)
Download
Metric
History
Related

Volume 6 Issue 2

June 2022

All Articles
Copyright © 2012 - 2024 International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences.
Pen Academic Publishing is a trademark of THDSoft.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. CC BY-NC-ND
Electronic Journal Management System. This software was developed in Türkiye. ejournal.gen.tr
Pen Academic Publishing General Publication Policy: