International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences
Abbreviation: IJIASOS | ISSN (Online): 2602-4500 | DOI: 10.29329/ijiasos

Research article    |    Open Access
International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences Volume 10 (2026)

Necro-Aesthetic Creation in Keats’s Isabella; or, The Pot of Basil

Tülay Dağoğlu, Yıldız Kılıç

pp. 1 - 18   |  DOI: https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasos.2026.1425.3

Publish Date: March 31, 2026  |   Single/Total View: 0/0   |   Single/Total Download: 0/0


Abstract

This study examines John Keats’s “Isabella; or, The Pot of Basil” through the theoretical lens of necro-aesthetics, demonstrating how the poem presents the transformation of necropolitical violence into artistic production. Drawing on the theories of necropolitics, as proposed by Achille Mbembe, as well as the description of necropolitics as a regime of sensation developed in The Aesthetics of Necropolitics and Christina Sharpe’s “wake work” as a form of living with the dead, the study argues how Isabella’s grieving becomes mourning-as-making, in which tending to the dead emerges as sustained artistic labour rather than pathological fixation. The brothers’ act of murdering Lorenzo illustrates necropolitical sovereignty where life becomes disposable based on an economy that values class, use-value, and futurity. Isabella’s act resists this because she turns life into form by unearthing Lorenzo’s severed head and placing it in a basil pot to grow it as a living aesthetic object that embodies life through intimacy achieved through material and semiotic engagements. As she stops engaging with society temporally, this act is perceived not as negation but as concentration that corresponds to Sharpe’s notion of wake work. The article further argues that this necro-aesthetic practice is disrupted, almost brutally, through the theft of the basil pot by the brothers, who commit a second necropolitical violence, this time not just on the dead but also on the aesthetic that facilitates sustaining. Ultimately, Isabella’s demise shows that the ethical premise in this poem is that evil lies not in death but in the forbiddance of artistic expressions in which the dead would be able to linger or be in some form present in life.

Keywords: Necro-Aesthetics, Necropolitics, Wake Work, Keats, Isabella; or, The Pot of Basil


How to Cite this Article?

APA 7th edition
Dagoglu, T., & Kilic, Y. (2026).

Necro-Aesthetic Creation in Keats’s Isabella; or, The Pot of Basil

. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences, 10(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasos.2026.1425.3

Harvard
Dagoglu, T. and Kilic, Y. (2026).

Necro-Aesthetic Creation in Keats’s Isabella; or, The Pot of Basil

. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences, 10(1), pp. 1-18.

Chicago 16th edition
Dagoglu, Tulay and Yildiz Kilic (2026). "

Necro-Aesthetic Creation in Keats’s Isabella; or, The Pot of Basil

". International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences 10 (1):1-18. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasos.2026.1425.3

References
  1. Bataille, G. (1997). The Bataille reader (F. Botting & S. Wilson, Eds.). Blackwell. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen, K.-P. (2019). “Sick within the rose’s just domain”: The material sublime and pathological poetics in Keats’s Isabella; or, the Pot of Basil. Journal for the Study of Romanticisms, 8(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.14220/jsor.2019.8.1.35 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  3. Çameli, M. M. (2023). The home as emblem of women’s ensnarement in Alfred Lord Tennyson’s Mariana and The Lady of Shalott. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, (58), 245–254. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1245883 [Google Scholar] [Crossref] 
  4. Gordon, A. F. (2008). Ghostly matters: Haunting and the sociological imagination. University of Minnesota Press. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gržinić, M. (2018). What is the aesthetics of necropolitics? In N. Lushetich (Ed.), The aesthetics of necropolitics (pp. 17–36). Rowman & Littlefield International. [Google Scholar]
  6. Keats, J. (1958). The letters of John Keats, 1814–1821 (H. E. Rollins, Ed.; Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  7. Keats, J. (1905). The poems of John Keats (E. De Sélincourt, Ed.). Dodd, Mead & Company. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection (L. S. Roudiez, Trans.). Columbia University Press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Lauro, S. J. (2018). Get Out: From Atlantic slavery to Black Lives Matter. In N. Lushetich (Ed.), The aesthetics of necropolitics (pp. 37–54). Rowman & Littlefield International. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lushetich, N. (Ed.). (2018). The aesthetics of necropolitics. Rowman & Littlefield International. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics (S. Corcoran, Trans.). Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
  12. Miller, J. W. (1965). Keats’ concept of death (Doctoral dissertation, Lehigh University). https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/3317 [Google Scholar]
  13. Pettet, E. C. (1957). On the poetry of Keats. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Praz, M. (1951). The romantic agony (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sacks, P. M. (1985). The English elegy: Studies in the genre from Spenser to Yeats. Johns Hopkins University Press. [Google Scholar]
  16. Sharpe, C. (2016). In the wake: On blackness and being. Duke University Press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tate, A. (1948). A reading of Keats. In On the limits of poetry: Selected essays, 1928–1948 (pp. 165–184). Swallow Press. [Google Scholar]
  18. Tello, V. (2018). Aesthetic autonomy at the border: Notes on necro-art. In N. Lushetich (Ed.), The aesthetics of necropolitics (pp. 55–75). Rowman & Littlefield International. [Google Scholar]
  19. Vendler, H. (2003). The odes of John Keats. Harvard University Press. [Google Scholar]